<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:gml="http://www.opengis.net/gml"
xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>QUEST Community Science Blog - KQED &#187; homeenergy</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.kqed.org/quest/blog/tag/homeenergy/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.kqed.org/quest/blog</link>
	<description>Science, Environment, and Nature in the SF Bay Area</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 21 Nov 2009 02:48:20 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
			<item>
		<title>&quot;Leafing&quot; Through the Economic Stimulus Package</title>
		<link>http://www.kqed.org/quest/blog/2009/02/23/the_home_energy_stimulus/</link>
		<comments>http://www.kqed.org/quest/blog/2009/02/23/the_home_energy_stimulus/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 23 Feb 2009 19:13:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Jim Gunshinan</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Engineering]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Environment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Partners]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[barack obama]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[economic stimulus]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[energy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[homeenergy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[policy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[renewable energy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[weatherization]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.kqed.org/quest/blog/?p=1404</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Highlights from the American Recovery and Reinvestment Act of 2009, signed by President Obama on Tuesday.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><span class="left"><img src="http://www.kqed.org/quest/blog/wp-content/uploads/2009/02/greenhouse.jpg" alt="" /><em>The front of Leaf House. Photo credit: The Leaf Community</em></span><br />
Highlights from the <a href="http://www.house.gov/billtext/hr1_legtext_cr.pdf" target="_blank">American Recovery and Reinvestment Act of 2009</a>, signed by President Obama on Tuesday:</p>
<p>1.    The economic stimulus act provides $5 billion for the Weatherization Assistance Program; increases the eligible income level for the program from 150% of <a href="http://aspe.hhs.gov/POVERTY/09poverty.shtml" target="_blank">poverty level</a> (determined by criteria established by the Office of Management and Budget) to 200% of poverty level; increases the amount of money that can be spent per home from $2,500 to $6,500; and allows weatherization assistance for homes that were weatherized before 1994 (previously, homes weatherized after 1979 could not be "re-weatherized").</p>
<p>2.    $4 billion was allocated to the <a href="http://www.hud.gov/" target="_blank">Department of Housing and Urban Development</a> (HUD) to retrofit public housing, and $510 million to retrofit the homes of Native Americans.</p>
<p>3.    The stimulus bill gives $500 million to the <a href="http://www.dol.gov/" target="_blank">Department of Labor</a> to train workers for careers in energy efficiency and renewable energy.</p>
<p>4.    The American Recovery and Reinvestment Act of 2009 provides increased tax credits for homeowners for energy efficiency improvements and renewable energy installations; the act increases the tax credit for energy efficiency improvements from 10% to 30%, and gives a 30% tax credit for the cost of qualified solar energy systems, geothermal heat pumps, small wind turbines, and fuel cell systems.</p>
<p>5.    The tax credit for homeowners who install a natural gas refueling system for a natural gas car, a charging system for a plug-in electric or hybrid vehicle, a hydrogen refueling station for a fuel cell car, or another refueling system in their homes is doubled from $1,000 to $2,000. The credit is good through 2010 for most refueling systems and through 2014 for hydrogen refueling systems.</p>
<p>There are many more provisions in the bill that support building energy efficiency, automotive energy efficiency, the manufacture and use of renewable energy systems, and research into (among other things) high performance batteries. </p>
<p>We recently covered in <a href="http://www.homeenergy.org/" target="_blank">Home Energy Magazine</a> a story from Italy about the <a href="http://www.leafcommunity.com" target="_blank">Leaf Community</a>. It is a live/work community outside of Rome where they create all the energy they need by taking it from the sun, the wind, and the ground (using geothermal heat pumps). They are doing a lot of research into storing energy, and that is clearly becoming a top priority among scientists. Energy produced from the sun and wind, for example, is intermittent, and sun and wind resources are often far from populations that need clean energy, requiring expensive transmission systems (more overhead wires). At Leaf House, they produce hydrogen using the electricity produced by photovoltaic solar panels, and store the hydrogen in a "chemical battery". The hydrogen can later be reclaimed and used in a fuel cell to create electricity.</p>
<p>Retrofitting homes to be more efficient, healthy, and sustainable is a "three-fer", as President Obama called it in a <a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=feMH7UYc9v8" target="_blank">recent television interview</a>: it saves energy; makes homes more affordable; and creates jobs. And research such as that taking place at Leaf House opens the door to unimagined, elegant solutions to our energy challenges. One thing that the economic stimulus package has already delivered &#8212; something that has long been lacking in the energy efficiency and renewable energy community &#8212; is hope.</p>

	<br><strong>Tags:&nbsp;</strong><a href="http://www.kqed.org/quest/blog/tag/barack-obama/" title="barack obama" rel="tag">barack obama</a>, <a href="http://www.kqed.org/quest/blog/tag/economic-stimulus/" title="economic stimulus" rel="tag">economic stimulus</a>, <a href="http://www.kqed.org/quest/blog/tag/energy/" title="energy" rel="tag">energy</a>, <a href="http://www.kqed.org/quest/blog/tag/homeenergy/" title="homeenergy" rel="tag">homeenergy</a>, <a href="http://www.kqed.org/quest/blog/tag/policy/" title="policy" rel="tag">policy</a>, <a href="http://www.kqed.org/quest/blog/tag/renewable-energy/" title="renewable energy" rel="tag">renewable energy</a>, <a href="http://www.kqed.org/quest/blog/tag/weatherization/" title="weatherization" rel="tag">weatherization</a><br/>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.kqed.org/quest/blog/2009/02/23/the_home_energy_stimulus/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>3</slash:comments>
		<georss:point featurename="[37.8686, -122.267]">37.8686 -122.267</georss:point>

		<media:thumbnail url="http://www.kqed.org/quest/blog/wp-content/uploads/2009/02/greenhouse.jpg" />
		<media:content url="http://www.kqed.org/quest/blog/wp-content/uploads/2009/02/greenhouse.jpg" medium="image" />
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>R.I.P. for CFLs? LEDs to Light our Future</title>
		<link>http://www.kqed.org/quest/blog/2008/08/22/rip-for-cfls-leds-to-light-our-future/</link>
		<comments>http://www.kqed.org/quest/blog/2008/08/22/rip-for-cfls-leds-to-light-our-future/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 22 Aug 2008 21:06:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Jim Gunshinan</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Engineering]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Environment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[KQED]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Partners]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[cfls]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[conservation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[energy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[homeenergy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[LED]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[light bulb]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[light emitting diode]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[lighting]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[mercury]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[pbs]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.kqed.org/quest/blog/?p=797</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I've been a cheerleader for compact fluorescent lamps (CFL) in this blog and will abandon the technology in a millisecond. When it comes to technology, my loyalties are short lived. ]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><span class="left"><img src="http://www.kqed.org/quest/blog/wp-content/uploads/2008/08/9_watts.jpg" /></span>I've been a cheerleader for compact fluorescent lamps (CFL) in this blog and will abandon the technology in a millisecond. When it comes to technology, my loyalties are short lived. I'm writing this from Asilomar State Park in Pacific Grove, California, during the American Council for an Energy Efficient Economy (ACEEE) bi-annual Summer Study on energy use in buildings. Early in the week, the plenary speaker and a 2008 ACEEE Champion of Energy Efficiency, Philips Lighting's Kevin Dowling, Vice President for Innovation in Solid State Lighting, turned my head from CFLs to light emitting diodes (LEDs), my new little darling, hero, and true lighting love.</p>
<p>Philips Lighting was the first manufacturer to commercialize CFL bulbs in the 1970s, and has long been an innovator, as well as being the largest manufacturer of lighting products in the world. "We aren't even near the limits to this technology," said Dowling. Technically, solid-state lighting, or LED lighting, is ready to be the next big thing after CFLs. The challenge that remains is making LED lighting affordable and ubiquitous. That is a challenge when you consider that today's incandescents work in 1880s-style fixtures. Dowling proved it in a backroom of the Smithsonian in Washington D.C. And in the progressive Pacific Northwest, after 15 years on the market, CFLs have achieved only 8% market penetration.</p>
<p>But LEDs are an easy sell. Compared to incandescent lights, which produce 10–12 lumens per watt (lpw), and fluorescents, which produce 90-100 lpw, the best LEDs produce approximately 100 lpw, have the potential to reach the 150–200 lpw level, can last 35 years and don't release any mercury into the environment. History has shown that the cost of LED technology has decreased, while performance has increased&#8211; both exponentially. Dowling expects LED lighting performance to continue increasing 35% per year while the price decreases about 20% per year, and that in 24-36 months LED lighting will reach the level of linear fluorescent lights in light output per watt of energy use.</p>
<p>LEDs have evolved from mostly lighting that attracts attention to lighting that illuminates. LEDs can produce a range of color temperatures, from cool to warm. It has been installed in the Old North Church in Boston to rave reviews from the curators of the historic church. Legislation is supporting the evolution of the lighting technology. Legislation and guidelines will raise lighting efficacy to at least 45 lpw by 2020, according to Dowling, making LEDs an easy choice.</p>
<p>Goodbye CFLs, it was good while it lasted.</p>

	<br><strong>Tags:&nbsp;</strong><a href="http://www.kqed.org/quest/blog/tag/cfls/" title="cfls" rel="tag">cfls</a>, <a href="http://www.kqed.org/quest/blog/tag/conservation/" title="conservation" rel="tag">conservation</a>, <a href="http://www.kqed.org/quest/blog/tag/energy/" title="energy" rel="tag">energy</a>, <a href="http://www.kqed.org/quest/blog/tag/homeenergy/" title="homeenergy" rel="tag">homeenergy</a>, <a href="http://www.kqed.org/quest/blog/tag/kqed/" title="KQED" rel="tag">KQED</a>, <a href="http://www.kqed.org/quest/blog/tag/led/" title="LED" rel="tag">LED</a>, <a href="http://www.kqed.org/quest/blog/tag/light-bulb/" title="light bulb" rel="tag">light bulb</a>, <a href="http://www.kqed.org/quest/blog/tag/light-emitting-diode/" title="light emitting diode" rel="tag">light emitting diode</a>, <a href="http://www.kqed.org/quest/blog/tag/lighting/" title="lighting" rel="tag">lighting</a>, <a href="http://www.kqed.org/quest/blog/tag/mercury/" title="mercury" rel="tag">mercury</a>, <a href="http://www.kqed.org/quest/blog/tag/pbs/" title="pbs" rel="tag">pbs</a><br/>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.kqed.org/quest/blog/2008/08/22/rip-for-cfls-leds-to-light-our-future/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>6</slash:comments>
		<georss:point featurename="[37.8686, -122.267]">37.8686 -122.267</georss:point>

		<media:thumbnail url="http://www.kqed.org/quest/blog/wp-content/uploads/2008/08/9_watts.jpg" />
		<media:content url="http://www.kqed.org/quest/blog/wp-content/uploads/2008/08/9_watts.jpg" medium="image" />
	</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
