<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:gml="http://www.opengis.net/gml"
xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: A fishy odyssey through the delta</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.kqed.org/quest/blog/2008/07/07/a-fishy-odyssey-through-the-delta/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.kqed.org/quest/blog/2008/07/07/a-fishy-odyssey-through-the-delta/</link>
	<description>Science, Environment, and Nature in the SF Bay Area</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 21 Nov 2009 22:39:48 -0800</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: ann dickinson</title>
		<link>http://www.kqed.org/quest/blog/2008/07/07/a-fishy-odyssey-through-the-delta/comment-page-1/#comment-63268</link>
		<dc:creator>ann dickinson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 13 May 2009 23:10:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.kqed.org/quest/blog/?p=684#comment-63268</guid>
		<description>Thanks for your comment, Steve. Though it might seem like hatcheries would be the solution, unfortunately they are not. Captive-raised delta smelt have never been successfully released into the wild. Even if it could be done successfully, it may not be a good idea: For example, evaluations of the effects of hatchery-reared salmon released into the wild suggest they may be doing more harm than good to the species and the ecosystem. 

And of course hatcheries wouldn’t do anything to address the other problems impacting delta smelt and so many other species in the Delta: poor water quality and lack of freshwater flows due to excessive water exports.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks for your comment, Steve. Though it might seem like hatcheries would be the solution, unfortunately they are not. Captive-raised delta smelt have never been successfully released into the wild. Even if it could be done successfully, it may not be a good idea: For example, evaluations of the effects of hatchery-reared salmon released into the wild suggest they may be doing more harm than good to the species and the ecosystem. </p>
<p>And of course hatcheries wouldn’t do anything to address the other problems impacting delta smelt and so many other species in the Delta: poor water quality and lack of freshwater flows due to excessive water exports.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: steve</title>
		<link>http://www.kqed.org/quest/blog/2008/07/07/a-fishy-odyssey-through-the-delta/comment-page-1/#comment-63228</link>
		<dc:creator>steve</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 09 May 2009 02:23:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.kqed.org/quest/blog/?p=684#comment-63228</guid>
		<description>The solution may not have to be to redesign the fish screens.  The answer may be simpler and less costly.  Hatcheries to raise smelt to increase and off set the smelt population that is lost by the pumps.  10% of the farm raised fish could be released above the pumping stations and 90% past the pumping stations.  Everyone would be happy.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The solution may not have to be to redesign the fish screens.  The answer may be simpler and less costly.  Hatcheries to raise smelt to increase and off set the smelt population that is lost by the pumps.  10% of the farm raised fish could be released above the pumping stations and 90% past the pumping stations.  Everyone would be happy.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
